Dan Tufis & al * Corpora and Corpus-Based Morpho-Lexical Processing
| Attribute Position |
Attribute | Value | Example |
| 1 | Type | coordinating (c) | ºi, dar |
| subordinating (s) | cã, dacã | ||
| 2 | Formation | simple (s) | deoarece |
| compound (c) | de vreme ce | ||
| 3 | Coord Type | simple (s) | ºi,deoarece |
| repetit (r) | fie...fie... | ||
| correlat (c) | atât...cât ºi | ||
| 4 | Sub-Type | negative (z) | nici |
| positive (p) | dar | ||
| 5 | Clitic | no (n) | cãn aºa |
| yes (y) | c-y-aºa |
| Attribute Position |
Attribute | Value | Example |
| 1 | Type | cardinal (c) | trei |
| ordinal (o) | (al) treilea | ||
| fractal (f) | treime | ||
| multiple (m) | întreit | ||
| collect (l) | tustrei | ||
| 2 | Gender | masculine (m) | doi, primul |
| feminine (f) | douã, prima | ||
| 3 | Number | singular (s) | primul |
| plural (p) | primii | ||
| 4 | Case | direct (r) | primul |
| oblique (o) | primului | ||
| 5 | Form | digit (d) | 1690 |
| letter (l) | unsprezece | ||
| both (b) | 5 mii | ||
| roman (r) | XIV | ||
| 6 | Definiteness | yes (y) | primul |
| no (n) | prim | ||
| 7 | Clitic | yes (y) | unu- |
| no (n) | doi |
| Attribute Position |
Attribute | Value | Example |
| 1 | Syntactic Type | nominal(n) | dna (doamna) |
| verbal (v) | v. (vezi) | ||
| adjectival (a) | ant. (anterior) | ||
| adverbial (r) | f. (foarte) | ||
| pronominal (p) | d-voastrã(dumneavoastrã) | ||
| 2 | Gender | masculine (m) | dlui |
| feminine (f) | dna | ||
| 3 | Number | singular (s) | dna |
| plural (p) | dnele | ||
| 4 | Case | direct (r) | dna |
| oblique (o) | dnei | ||
| 5 | Definiteness | yes (y) | dnele |
| no (n) | dne |
| Attribute Position |
Attribute | Value | Example |
| 1 | Type | negation (z) | nu,n- |
| infinitive (n) | a | ||
| subjunctive (s) | sã | ||
| aspect (a) | fi | ||
| future (f) | o | ||
| 3 | Clitic | yes (y) | ny-am |
| no (n) | nu am |
In Romanian, as in most other languages, no further refinement of the interjections has been considered.
As with the interjections, no further refinement
of residual has been considered. This class, inherited from EAGLES
standard proposal, was meant to cover textual units such as mathematical
formulas, alphanumeric strings, and generally everything that
cannot go easily into another category.
35